During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40
，详情可参考一键获取谷歌浏览器下载
В стране ЕС белоруске без ее ведома удалили все детородные органы22:38。体育直播对此有专业解读
阿爸好像从没和命运讨价还价过。我和村里人都没见过他生气，也没见过他对谁发火。被人调侃，他笑着；被人占便宜，他也笑着；有人语气重了些，他还是笑着，很少辩解。他仿佛默认自己在任何场合都站在边缘——靠墙，靠门，或是桌角的位置。别人说什么，他就听什么。